Climategate, parte II

Climategate 2.0: the Warmists’ seven stages of grief  e Uh oh, global warming loons: here comes Climategate II, por James Delingpole. Here’s an amusing analysis of the warmist trolls’ various lines of defence, which I picked up from the comments at Watts Up With That: (I wd give a hat tip except I’ve gone and lost …

Continuar a ler Climategate, parte II

ClimateGate: Como instituir o pensamento único

“How to Manufacture a Climate Consensus” de Patrick J. Michaels (WSJ) Few people understand the real significance of Climategate, the now-famous hacking of emails from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU). Most see the contents as demonstrating some arbitrary manipulating of various climate data sources in order to fit preconceived hypotheses (true), …

Continuar a ler ClimateGate: Como instituir o pensamento único

ClimateGate: O mistério das estações russas

No blog de James Delingpole (Daily Telegraph) On Tuesday, the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data. The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not …

Continuar a ler ClimateGate: O mistério das estações russas

ClimateGate: O mistério das estações chineses

No blog de James Delingpole (Daily Telegraph) [T]here is great concern among sceptics that the data records used to support the IPCC’s claims about “unprecedented” and catastrophic late 20th century global warming are untrustworthy. Not only do these records rely on a dwindling number of weather surface stations whose readings have been skewed either by …

Continuar a ler ClimateGate: O mistério das estações chineses

Climategate: One Must Ignore 200 Years of Observations to Believe in AGW

Artigo de David Bellamy no PJM This August, right in the middle of the BBC’s promised barbecue summer (which didn’t come to pass), the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit disclosed that it had destroyed the raw data for its global surface temperature records. Despite the fact that they own some of the most …

Continuar a ler Climategate: One Must Ignore 200 Years of Observations to Believe in AGW

ClimateGate (41): o famoso “truque”

Before getting homogenized, temperatures in Darwin were falling at 0.7 Celcius per century … but after the homogenization, they were warming at 1.2 Celcius per century. And the adjustment that they made was over two degrees per century … when those guys “adjust”, they don’t mess around. And the adjustment is an odd shape, with …

Continuar a ler ClimateGate (41): o famoso “truque”